Efficacy of Topically Delivered Moxifloxacin against Wound Infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

**Recently, many full text articles have become available through that fantastic site Pub Med - National Institutes of Health.  Although this was written two years ago, I found it quite interesting and informative and wanted to share it with you. Several years ago, I had a systemic infection of both pseudomona and staph aureaus.  Thanksfully, the staph was not the resistant type.  Even then I was on IV antibiotics for three solid months. Pat **

F. Jacobsen, C. Fisahn, M. Sorkin, . Thiele,T. Hirsch, I. Stricker, T. , A. Roemer, B. Fugmann, and L. Steinstraesser^,*T. Klaassen,

^{Author information ► Article notes ►} 

2011 May

ABSTRACT

Wound infection is a common risk for patients with chronic nonhealing wounds, causing high morbidity and mortality. Currently, systemic antibiotic treatment is the therapy of choice, despite often leading to several side effects and the risk of an insufficient tissue penetration due to impaired blood supply. If systemically delivered, moxifloxacin penetrates well into inflammatory blister fluid, muscle, and subcutaneous adipose tissues and might therefore be a possible option for the topical treatment of skin and infected skin wounds. In this study, topical application of moxifloxacin was investigated in comparison to mupirocin, linezolid, and gentamicin using a porcine wound infection and a rat burn infection model. Both animal models were performed either by an inoculation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Wound fluid, tissue, and blood samples were taken, and bacterial counts as well as the moxifloxacin concentration were determined for a 14-day follow-up. A histological comparison of the rat burn wound tissues was performed. Both strains were susceptible to moxifloxacin and gentamicin, whereas mupirocin and linezolid were effective only against MRSA. All antibiotics showed efficient reduction of bacterial counts, and except with MRSA, infected burn wounds reached bacterial counts below 10⁵ CFU/g tissue. Additionally, moxifloxacin was observed to promote wound healing as determined by histologic analysis, while no induction of bacterial resistance was observed during the treatment period. The use of topical antibiotics for the treatment of infected wounds confers many benefits. Moxifloxacin is therefore an ideal candidate, due to its broad antibacterial spectrum, its high efficiency, and its potential to promote wound healing.

Read the full text article:

PubMed - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy